Senate Backs Proposal for Extra Security at U.S. Borders
Published: June 24, 2013 - New York Times
WASHINGTON — The bipartisan push to overhaul the
nationfs immigration laws took a major step forward Monday evening when the
Senate endorsed a proposal to substantially bolster security along the nationfs
southern borders as part of measure that would provide a path to citizenship for
11 million undocumented immigrants already in the country.
The 67 to 27 vote prevented any filibuster of the plan
to devote roughly $30 billion to border enforcement measures, including nearly
doubling the Border Patrol force to 40,000 agents from 21,000, and completing
700 miles of fencing. Opponents of the enhanced security questioned whether the
steps would ever be taken and said that the legislation should require that the
border be secure before undocumented immigrants could begin to seek legal
status.
But the solid bipartisan support for the border
security proposal crafted by two Republican senators, Bob Corker of
Tennessee and John Hoeven of North Dakota, suggested that advocates of the
overhaul had the votes needed to clear remaining procedural hurdles and pass the
legislation, perhaps before legislators return home during the July 4 recess.
The Corker-Hoeven plan helped bring on board more than
a dozen Republicans who voted Monday to take up the provision, many of whom said
they were reluctant to support any immigration overhaul that did not secure the
southern border and guard against a future wave of illegal immigrants. Their
amendment will also require a $3.2 billion high-tech border surveillance plan —
including drones and long-range thermal imaging cameras — as well as an
electronic employment verification system and a visa entry/exit system at all
air and sea ports.
All those security measures must be in place before
any immigrant can become a legal permanent resident and receive a green card.
Mr. Corker said the new border security proposal
gstrengthens this bill, puts it in balance, creates trust with the American
people and creates the kind of pathway that many people are seeking.h
Despite a clamoring for stronger border security from
many Republicans in the Senate and the House, some leading Republicans dug in
against the Corker-Hoeven plan. Senator John Cornyn of Texas, the No. 2
Republican in the Senate, said that he could not gsupport an amendment cobbled
together at the 11th hour that doubles the Border Patrol without knowing how
much it will cost of whether it is even the right strategy.h
Other Republicans and advocacy groups opposed to the
bill also offered loud complaints: that the legislation was drafted behind
closed doors by a small group of senators; that the bill was too long and not
given ample time for discussion; that the legislation needed to be stronger when
it came to border security; that the Corker-Hoeven amendment was simply a
toothless provision intended to give Republicans cover to vote for a bill they
still viewed as gamnesty.h
On Monday, a group of 14 Republican senators sent a
letter to Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, calling for a
gserious, extensive amendment process.h
gThis is deeply, deeply disturbing,h read the letter,
referring to the fact that only a fraction of the amendments filed to the bill
had been voted on. gIt is effectively shutting down the American peoplefs
ability to be heard on this issue through their elected representatives.h
A spokesman for Mr. Reid, however, pointed out that
many of the 14 Republicans were the same senators who had failed to work with
Democrats to reach a compromise to bring up more amendments on the Senate floor.
Proponents of the immigration overhaul were also not
entirely pleased with the Corker-Hoeven plan. A coalition of groups representing
border communities urged senators to reject the amendment, which they called gan
example of excessive and wasteful government spendingh and a gpoorly thought-out
policy.h
gIt is an assault on our system of checks and balances
and seriously threatens the quality of life of border residents,h wrote the
border groups, in a statement.
Other advocates worried that in an effort to garner
broad bipartisan support for the bill, Democratic senators were making too many
concessions without getting anything in return. The border plan, for instance,
also includes a provision by Senator Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of Utah, that
would prevent undocumented immigrants from qualifying for Social Security
benefits, as well as from receiving federal welfare funds.
gIt is a tough pill to swallow, and there is no
guarantee it will not get worse later in the process,h said Kevin Appleby, the
director of migration policy at the United States Conference of Catholic
Bishops, referring to the amendment. gIf the path to citizenship is further
weakened, there could come a tipping point where the bill becomes
unsupportable.h
If the bill passes the Senate, it will head to the
Republican–controlled House, where it already faces vocal opposition. Speaker
John A. Boehner of Ohio has publicly said he will not bring any immigration bill
up for a vote that does not have the support of the majority of House
Republicans, a decision that pleases the Tea Party wing of his caucus but that
also raises significant hurdles for passing any broad immigration bill in the
House, where many conservatives oppose any pathway to citizenship.
Speaking on the Senate floor Monday, Mr. Reid urged
Mr. Boehner to take up the Senatefs immigration bill quickly, even if he doesnft
have the support of the majority of House Republicans.
gRather than twisting the arms of Tea Party
extremists, just work with moderates from both parties to pass bipartisan
legislation,h Mr. Reid said. gAnd rather than trying to force legislation
designed to please only the right wing, my friend, the speaker should just take
the easy way out.h